Showing posts with label bbc. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bbc. Show all posts

Wednesday, 5 March 2014

#SaveBBCThree #SaveBBC3

I am writing this blog post on the rumours that the British Broadcasting Company are seriously considering the idea of axing the channel BBC Three (BBC3) from television that have led to #SaveBBCThree and #SaveBBC3 becoming tweeting trends as people. This tweeting surge has come mainly in the younger age bracket which the channel was actually aimed for them, however it also became the channel that new shows, personalities and careers.
The channel could soon be leaving our screens.
Since BBC Three was launched, it became a channel with personality. The show had it's own share of original content as intended. Over the years original content has included a range of genres from comedy to reality to factual, even political. Shows such as Little Britain, Gavin And Stacey and Torchwood started at BBC Three before moving to the original flagship channels at that time on analogue television whilst shows such as How Not To Live Your Life, Off The Hook, Ideal, White Van Man, Pramface, Bad Education, Two Pints Of Lager (continued on BBC Three until it's end in 2011 from the point the channel was launched), Russell Howard's Good News and Uncle have been shown on this channel. And those shows that have shown on it (other than Torchwood) are just the comedies. The channel also includes a range of factual and reality shows over the years such as Sun Sex And Suspicious Parents, The Hotel Of Mum And Dad, Young Dumb And Living Off Mum, Worlds Strictest Parents and the various documentaries which have included such things as Russell Brand on drug addiction, a look at countries in the EU regarding the economy and a documentary on payday loan companies such as Wonga (a rant best left for another post).

Cult shows such as Little Britain and comedians Matt Lucas and David Walliams owe the beginning of their success to the channel.

Comedies such as Bad Education will become harder to come by without BBC Three

Reality shows such as Sun Sex and Suspicious parents has become popular with young adults but would a show with it's twist be commissioned  on another BBC channel.

It seems obvious to me that some shows, for instance in my case Snog, Marry, Avoid aren't loved by everyone. That said, they have a decent fan base and it isn't like every show on BBC One is to every viewers taste, for instance I cannot stand The One Show (or any show Matt Baker hosts, I don't know, but I can't stand his voice, but that's my opinion, many may think he's a great host). Some will also say some shows are "trashy" on BBC Three, but when channels aimed at similar audiences show shows such as The Only Way Is Essex and Made In Chelsea you could easily argue that BBC Three has an edge of class over it's competitors. 

The most important show I would argue on BBC Three however is actually Free Speech. Neither ITV 2 or E4 give their aimed viewers, the younger adults, a chance to have a voice. BBC Three has done incredibly well with this, especially as this is a generation that includes a majority who feel they have been screwed over by the Governments throughout their lives (again another rant blog for the future). Whilst I understand the fact that some of the guests are often disappointing, for instance I don't understand why the BBC have got snob Katie Hopkins on the show, but then again, this is the company that have paid the former editor of The Sun magazine (you can't call something with no news and serial defamation a Newspaper) Kelvin McKenzie several times on the flagship political show Question Time. Both are seen by many, in the latter case, rightly with no arguments, as villains, so it isn't an issue with the BBC getting substandard guests, as it has happened to both. Either way Free Speech has seen people get into politics and current issues, it has also given a voice where young people can get their opinion over as there is always a member of the Government and opposition there regardless of the other few. Whether the show has parliament watching and paying attention is unlikely at the moment, however come the next election it may mean more young voters and a different election and all of this thanks to a show on BBC Three. 

So I'm not saying close down BBC Four or another channel, in fact in the ideal world they would both be saved, however to find the next Jack Whitehall's, for young people to get a voice or show their talents and for some dangers to the current generation to be shown BBC Three is a vital channel to keep. Arguably the most important behind the flagship channel BBC One. The people of the generation BBC Three is aimed at aren't a bad generation but a generation who have had a lot of hope stolen, probably more than the other age groups in this country from cuts over the last few years, many face unemployment after education or the end of apprenticeships if they're not already unemployed despite putting in the effort. BBC Three is aimed at them and gives a voice. Maybe what the BBC should be doing is finding more of a way to give average viewers of BBC Three a chance to show their voice, maybe with a weekly phone in show for instance as well as the current Free Speech, but getting rid of the channel is not and will never be the answer.

There are other cuts that could be made. Graham Norton is on £4.5million a year. Jeremy Clarkson got a large wage last year (although his wage is actually £1million, selling his part of the company that owns Top Gear to the BBC saw him make a lot more than that). Although I like the latter, maybe the BBC should aim to do some wage cuts. The top office sees people paid hundreds of thousands and the people at the head of Radio One aren't fit to run a bath never mind their radio station after banning Robbie Williams and Green Day as well as considering Muse, the latter two on quality of music, despite both bands selling out stadiums and Muse getting a number one album with their last, Robbie Williams was banned for having an audience that was seen as too old. So after all of this, it is easy to conclude there are many other things that the BBC could easily cut. BBC Three is a channel that needs to stay, for the next generation to come to love as the original BBC Three generation become the adults, the people, the power of today.

Thursday, 11 July 2013

I'm back!

Hey guys! First of all I must apologise that I haven't blogged for a week, sometimes I have just forgot other days I've been busy. When I say busy I've been:

1) trying to get a job - I've recreated my cv and sent it to loads of people in my battle to get a job over summer as I need money for next uni year as well as some more for Reading...I also want a PS4 so like I guess not the cheapest taste but ya'know! Interview tomorrow, so there is hope!

2) I've taken up trying to become good at darts, as many will know I'm useless, well my doubling is very slowly mildly improving as well as well as power scoring, although it would be nice to become consistent! That's a target, maybe by the time I'm back in Plymouth I can throw decent scores and win a few games against mates! I haven't seen much to claim that I will be beating Philip Taylor anytime soon though.

3) I've watched the sport keenly on tv. Now this involves Wimbledon which of course ended with an an epic finale as well as the European Darts Championship which Adrian Lewis has won and more recently I have watched the Ashes a bit. 

4) Who can resist watching Gordon Ramsey's Kitchen Nightmares USA. I mean if you haven't watch the one about Fiesta Sunrise, the Mexican guy is a hero! I'm not joking! 

Anyway I shall post some better stuff here shortly but for now ill cya all later!

Friday, 28 June 2013

The Rolling Stones - Are They Stupid?

Yes, going for controversy in my title today clearly! And yes this will be a rant. This is all to do with the bands arguments to do with how much of their set will be showed at Glastonbury (a set I shall not be watching...). Initially the pensioners went and said they would only allow 4 songs to be shown by the BBC, the official broadcasters of a festival that has before claimed to be the biggest festival in the world. Now what the hell is going on here? Glastonbury surely has a contract and surely these pensioners are aware if this? Unless their drug use and age has made them beyond demented.

The other point is this band in my eyes are a bunch of con artists. Now I understand their success and longevity gains a lot of fans, I also understand that many of these fans are in an older generation than myself. However I also know bands that have had multiple hit albums and also have gigs in similar venues. But did anyone see the prices of the two gigs at the O2? For anyone who doesn't want to open the article there, here is a quote from the article of the ORIGINAL prices "Tickets - originally priced between £190 and £400 - sold out within seven minutes, however many were bought by resellers such as Via GoGo, Seatwave and Double8 Tickets to sell at an inflated price." Now I don't care what the Rolling Stones have to say for the price and they can sue me if they feel insulted by my comments because there are no legs to stand on but when the cheapest ticket is £190, you're not showing you care about the fans, it more or less feels like you're telling the average fans to "fuck off" and not to bother. Just regarding ticket prices, I have been to see the Arctic Monkeys at the same venue, tickets were priced at less than £40, as were Green Day at the LG Arena (the two massive bands I've seen at arenas). And with this economic climate I would love to know how Mick Jagger, already living the best lifestyle possible thanks to all this money can justify these ticket prices. Apparently I hear he can, by claiming ticket touts have made tickets "not so cheap". For £190 I can pretty much buy a ticket to Reading Festival, little bit better than seeing pensioners way past their best sing songs they wrote before Britain ever considered a female Prime Minister!

So they announce they're to play at Glastonbury and people are excited, to see them at the festival and as with all headliners previously in my memory on the box. But then they tell us they're only to play four songs. So clearly people like myself, oblivious to the days when they were the biggest rock band by a mile on this planet can't make our judgements on them live. Well Mick, that's not good enough, that's not giving yourself a legacy to my generation, we have the Foo Fighters, The Strokes, Blink-182, Arctic Monkeys, Mumford And Sons, Green Day, Eminem, Biffy Clyro, Arcade Fire, My Chemical Romance, Muse...even Rihanna to create legacy through their sets in the last few years (and upcoming summer) to influence us and create a festival legacy. Missing the Rolling Stones isn't like missing a World Cup in England, there are now many artists on a parity (and to the youth of today bigger) regarding the Rolling Stones and every year there will be the chance to see various bands who are on this level. I'm perfectly fine with missing a band that charge more than 4 times the amount that the Arctic Monkeys do! They should be boycotted until tickets are affordable. 

Now they've agreed to play an hour for the BBC, but have arguments regarding it being broadcast abroad, I urge the BBC to grow some guts, you have the rights to Glastonbury, as you do for Reading and various other events, show the full set. If it annoys them, let them sue. Glastonbury rights include the headliners however old and prehistoric they may be! And to the Rolling Stones, let people of my age see what you're about and play on TV, if it's that good, it'll go down in history, like Nirvana at Reading 1992. 

What do you think? Leave a comment or tweet me! If you're the Rolling Stones and feel insulted at what I regard the truth you can also leave me a tweet, or send me a fax, seeming that is probably new to you!


Monday, 24 June 2013

Wimbledon - A Quick Preview - The British

Right, so Wimbledon starts today!

So my first post on Wimbledon is going to be on the British players, two reasons really, they get a lot of press from now and well only one will actually make it to week two! And I'm presuming we know who that will be. Well yeah, I was thinking Laura Robson...nah Andy Murray of course.

The British Women

 So there are five British women in the draw, two to keep your eyes on most would say. But then, you never know, all five have made the second round at least of a grand slam.

Elena Baltacha
Back from injury Baltacha shall try to carry on what seems to be good form in the early part of this week. Realistically the second round would be an achievement and is within her grasp as she players Pennetta of Italy in the first round, you never know, if the draw works out like a miracle round three could be on the cards, this is a woman who took Kirelinko to 3 tough sets and really, if she won important points, would have won!.

Anne Keothavong
The former British women number one, not that it's much to talk about, once a top 50 player...just...but now she's not even in the top 200. She does have a match against the unseeded Muguruza, but honestly getting to the second round would be about retaining the points she got for reaching round two last year!

Johanna Konta
She changed her nationality from Australian to British in tennis terms and sits at her highest ranking ever but it's only 137th in the world and honestly, that isn't about to go up at Wimbledon, she faces 16th seed Jelena Jankovic and to be honest having seen Konta play occasionally when the BBC showcase the British players over top 20 players in some competitions, it would take something special, this said she got to the second round of the US Open last year but couldn't follow it up at all in Melbourne. You almost wonder if she changed nationality to get the Wimbledon wild card...

Laura Robson
If any of these players have any hype right now it's the 19 year old British player Laura Robson, just missed out on a seed at Wimbledon, yet most of these points come from the second half of 2013. Her issue has been some poorer performances in the clay season particularly. On hard courts she reached the fourth round in the US Open with a stunning win over Clijsters as well as defeating Li Na. Here though, she faces Kirelinko. The question therefore is, can Laura Robson defeat another seed in a Grand Slam? One things for certain, the pressure is on compared to the US and Australian Slams.

Heather Watson
The British number 2 who looks to be in a battle really to be the number one, Watson has been able to impress many before at Wimbledon. This was last year, a third round. The last British woman standing. Now she has it all to prove again coming back from an illness that saw her miss Roland Garros. To prove Wimbledon 2012 was not a fluke she did get to the third round in Australia 6 months later. She may well do it again, if she can get through the young American Madison Keys, in what will be a close encounter.

The British Men

Kyle Edmund
There isn't much to say on Kyle Edmund really, he's only just coming onto the tour where he has taken part mainly in challengers, until now. He got to the quarter final of the junior French Open this year, yet he has looked good in other matches he has played, notable the 7-6 7-6 loss to Simon. But over five sets does he really have a chance against Janowicz, the only thing I can see on his side it a lack of knowledge about his game from the oponent, a good outcome though may be to win a set or two...

Andy Murray
Not a Wimbledon Champion yet he has won a tournament at the club in the 2012 Olympics, Andy Murray seems a changed man. He is a given to go far, at least to the quarter finals where he may well meet Rafa Nadal. He's also a Grand Slam champion now and the question will be, can Andy Murray deal with the extra pressure he recieves at the British Grand Slam? One can only wait and see whether he lifts that trophy or gives another emotional message like last year.

James Ward
Plays unseeded Lu in the first round and despite being another British player with a low rank, he has surprised before getting to the semis at queens a few years back. Although he won't go far this year, let's hope he pulls through the first round...as then he will play Andy Murray, not quite a Henman vs Rusedski but still a battle of two British players.


So there you have it, make what you will of the British competitors in Wimbledon, one thing seems sure though, Andy Murray will be the last Brit standing and unless Robson or Watson produce a few great results or it rains without fail for a week Andy Murray will also be the only Brit in week two. So if you want a British person to win Wimbledon, you'll be hoping for something similar to this.


Got any thoughts on this article, or Wimbledon itself, then please leave a comment, tweet me or email me, contributions are highly welcome and appreciated and may well be used in the next article.

Coverage of Wimbledon is available across all BBC platforms as well as on the official Wimbledon YouTube channel.